Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 88.9 1-Core 152 2-Core 301 98% 181 Pts	4-Core 603 8-Core 987 97% 795 Pts	64-Core 1,262 78% 1,262 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 65.2 Reflection 63.8 Parallax 66.9 53% 65.3 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 73.9 Splatting 62.9 65% 82 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB 1,011 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 284 304 291 290 288 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 416 Write 402 Mixed 383 SusWrite 291 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 63.5 209% 74.2 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 311 248% 346 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 250GB 1,011 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 20GB free Firmware: 1B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 424 Write 404 Mixed 393 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 66.3 210% 75.9 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 706GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 152 151 151 152 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 100 Mixed 93.9 SusWrite 150 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 68GB free Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 71 Mixed 51.2 47% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 3x16GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3 of 4 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 24.1 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 33.5 SC Mixed 25.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	536x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	489x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	404x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	842x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	314x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	306x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $926

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16