Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 01:50
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 873
82% 679 Pts
64-Core 1340
83% 1340 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 828 830 831 830 830 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,562
Write 2,400
Mixed 1,859
SusWrite 869
430% 1,923 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 92.6
301% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 890
668% 894 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 290%
Great: 346%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
313GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 730 159 216 335 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,107
Write 1,166
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 499
218% 968 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 71.4
226% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 912
685% 917 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 187%
Great: 365%
Adata SX 8100NP 256GB
108GB free
Firmware: 8205
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 217 221 219 220 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 392
Write 376
Mixed 372
SusWrite 220
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 36.8
123% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 96.8
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 96.3
73% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 88%
WD Game Drive 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 102
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 103
127% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.7
272% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 65%
WD Game Drive 8TB
4TB free, PID 2631
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 210 205 207 206 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 206
Mixed 138
SusWrite 206
254% 188 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 1.6
387% 4.83 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 7.3
DQ Mixed 1.7
310% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 104%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 35.6
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 27.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback