MSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory51.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '21 at 07:58
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 71.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 320
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,192
109% 912 Pts
64-Core 2,935
182% 2,935 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FFB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3878 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 187
Parallax 189
151% 187 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 164
Splatting 137
135% 169 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,964
Write 1,266
Mixed 541
275% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 43.4
158% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 213
206% 342 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 387 389 396 370 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 436
Write 427
Mixed 433
SusWrite 402
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 36.8
118% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 146
127% 198 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 133%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
1TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 173 180 183 173 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 179
Mixed 101
SusWrite 179
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1
300% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
330GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 120 127 127 122 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 120
Write 123
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 125
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
634GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 93 92 88 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 65
SusWrite 91.2
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 100%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
27GB free, PID 1821
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3 2.4 2.8 5.7 7.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 10
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 3.9
14% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.5
109% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
ST14000N M001G-2KJ103 14TB
2TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 20 15 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C16-16GTZNC F4-3000C15-16GTZ F4-3600C16-16GTZNC F4-3000C15-16GTZ 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76% Very good
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 25
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 23.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $684
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback