MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 19:09
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 888
89% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4763 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 219
Parallax 214
202% 227 fps
MRender 238
Gravity 164
Splatting 134
141% 179 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 165%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1561 1464 1357 1173 1069 911 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,119
Write 2,364
Mixed 1,699
SusWrite 1,256
418% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 84.8
282% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,413
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 1,258
948% 1,274 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 306%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
83GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 191 60 48 49 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 446
Mixed 416
SusWrite 144
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 45.1
154% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 348
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 121%
Patriot Burst 960GB
154GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 142 108 373 256 441 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 222
Write 106
Mixed 90
SusWrite 292
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 10.9
50% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 180 180 181 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 151
Mixed 95
SusWrite 179
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
256% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 28.8
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 27.3
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 164 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 22,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $860
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback