Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 67.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 306
93% 178 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 957
92% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,433
89% 1,433 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 261
Reflection 234
Parallax 298
213% 264 fps
MRender 294
Gravity 217
Splatting 161
176% 224 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 181%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 480GB-$300
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: OC34L5TA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 764 811 761 736 634 791 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 537
Mixed 408
SusWrite 749
108% 469 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 27
102% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 76.6
96% 172 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 181%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
223GB free
Firmware: 32B2T6TA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 776 915 954 817 787 674 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1288
Write 994
Mixed 835
SusWrite 821
220% 984 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 42.1
154% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 669
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 654
518% 714 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 182%
Great: 373%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 387 394 404 385 387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 402
Write 281
Mixed 338
SusWrite 387
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 38.7
131% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 131
106% 149 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 126%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
265GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3FB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 102 100 97 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 80.1
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 98.8
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 24.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 24
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 5R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 42% 45 325 260 240 27" 2560 1440 HPN3644 OMEN X 27
History: Score 31: 4R 1G 8B | Score 49: 5R 5G 9B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,201
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $256Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback