bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 01:17
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 145
2-Core 289
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 574
71% 543 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 66.9
57% 70.6 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 54.2
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 136GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 2.3 48 2 11 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 417
Write 311
Mixed 227
SusWrite 29.6
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 13.7
46% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 53
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 41
39% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 4GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 109 4 64 0" 1024 768 MSH062E HyperVMonitor
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback