Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 05:44
Run Duration425 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$250
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 198
2-Core 398
115% 224 Pts
4-Core 762
8-Core 1,366
128% 1,064 Pts
64-Core 1,891
117% 1,891 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9127
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 11.2
9% 12.3 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 0.3
6% 8.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1333 990 994 970 834 827 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,017
Write 2,063
Mixed 1,546
SusWrite 991
371% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 87.7
327% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,812
DQ Write 1,507
DQ Mixed 1528
1,180% 1,616 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 315%
Great: 297%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$112
526GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2387 2048 1909 1925 1912 1895 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 2526
Write 2,367
Mixed 2,292
SusWrite 2,013
518% 2,299 MB/s
4K Read 77.2
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 109
365% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,796
DQ Write 1609
DQ Mixed 1,693
1,272% 1,700 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 413%
Great: 477%
External USB3.0 DISK02 16TB
104GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 113 110 108 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 246
Mixed 173
SusWrite 109
254% 194 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 1.6
647% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 1.1
472% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
External USB3.0 DISK04 16TB
104GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 113 110 108 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 151
Write 140
Mixed 140
SusWrite 109
181% 135 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 1.2
366% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 122%
External USB3.0 DISK00 16TB
104GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 111 105 121 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 262
Write 243
Mixed 156
SusWrite 114
250% 194 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 1.1
640% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 2
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 2.2
620% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 115%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GD3600C18K2D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 4R 1G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 27% 51 57 29 60 34" 2560 1080 AOC3402 Q34G2G2
History: Score 9: 1R 1G 1B | Score 34: 4R 3G 5B | Score 32: 4R 1G 9B
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $827
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback