Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 16:17
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 833
86% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
PNY(196E 1314) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3894 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 111
Parallax 114
94% 114 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 102
Splatting 98
93% 116 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
530GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 434 430 429 444 445 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 446
Mixed 399
SusWrite 436
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 46.1
154% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
133GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,810
Write 2285
Mixed 1,930
451% 2,008 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 89.1
298% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,228
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 997
759% 1,032 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Samsung 980 1TB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 823 157 167 131 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,510
Write 1,206
Mixed 1,275
SusWrite 435
247% 1,107 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 91.9
319% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 811
630% 863 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 225%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 41.7
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 39.7
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 300 204 165 27" 2560 1440 AUS272B VG27WQ
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback