Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10M7003MUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10M7003MUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181127
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 21:24
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 135
59% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 340
48% 354 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 9.6
6% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsf5256gpuk TOSHIBA 256GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51055KLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 123 77 107 79 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 743
Write 235
Mixed 132
SusWrite 96.2
65% 302 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 34.2
90% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 232
193% 290 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79%
Great: 133%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
146GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 63
Write 15.3
Mixed 46
SusWrite 62
35% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 67%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 7.2 7.2 19 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 20
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 17.5
28% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 105 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 104
146% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 59%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00A3KB0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 105 106 107 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
Read 150
Write 148
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 104
165% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
463GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 102 105 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 132
Write 130
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 102
143% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 49%
WDC WD20 EARS-60MVWB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 3.9 0.1 0.5 1 0.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
Read 119
Write 121
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 1.9
96% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 6.4
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10M7003MUS Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M7003MUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback