Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X570-PRO (all builds)
Memory	60.7 GB free of 80 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210809
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 01:29
Run Duration	312 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 88.6 1-Core 142 2-Core 283 94% 171 Pts	4-Core 514 8-Core 1,072 93% 793 Pts	64-Core 2070 128% 2070 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275 75,918 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AMD(1002 0B36) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.22025.1006 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.6% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 123 Parallax 163 89% 132 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 112 Splatting 81.5 79% 97.9 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 5 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2796 2757 3114 2572 2550 2069 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	306% Outstanding	Read 1,994 Write 3,156 Mixed 1,758 SusWrite 2,643 542% 2,388 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 30.3 94% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 790 DQ Write 819 DQ Mixed 906 654% 839 MB/s
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 306% Great: 306%
Samsung 980 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 508 Write 754 Mixed 696 147% 652 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 25.9 88% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 615 DQ Write 475 DQ Mixed 833 545% 641 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 59%
Sabrent Rocket 4 1TB 256GB free Firmware: RKT4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 392 385 388 398 379 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Amd-raid Array 1 16TB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 405 405 413 408 401 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 251 Write 412 Mixed 117 SusWrite 405 215% 296 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 2.2 489% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 254%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB 898 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 1TB free Firmware: GX2M SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 149 142 145 147 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 147 Write 157 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 144 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.6 188% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 131%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB 898 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 1TB free Firmware: GX2M SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 141 127 134 139 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 116 Write 111 Mixed 26 SusWrite 134 70% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 184% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 131%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 839GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 111 109 111 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 104 Write 87.4 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 109 68% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 96%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 57GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 7.5 4.8 4.8 5.3 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	8.98% Terrible	Read 35.9 Write 8.2 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 6.9 17% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 31% 2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.98% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M4D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 79GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz 8192, 32767, 8192, 32767 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	107% Outstanding	MC Read 43.8 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 38.7 114% 40 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 29.5 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	60	25"	1280 720	DELD06F DELL U2515H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	896x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	822x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	779x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	607x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	411x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	352x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	371x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	298x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	208x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	188x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	170x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	152x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16