Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive397% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 21:56
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 993
92% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,283
79% 1,283 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Gigabyte(1458 232B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
168% Outstanding
Lighting 207
Reflection 240
Parallax 416
168% 288 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 165
Splatting 264
215% 265 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 168%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118
668GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3126 2705 1839 1856 1862 1866 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 2,816
Write 3,312
Mixed 3,031
SusWrite 2,209
642% 2,842 MB/s
4K Read 76.3
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 104
342% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,019
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 956
717% 958 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 397%
Great: 477%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 338 355 356 358 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 153
Write 213
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 348
46% 201 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 4.2
15% 5.73 MB/s
DQ Read 12.9
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 12.6
9% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 436%
Amd-raid Array 5 2TB
688GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 304 318 318 320 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 733
Write 768
Mixed 549
SusWrite 311
132% 590 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 21.4
97% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 95.3
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 143
127% 184 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 306%
Amd-raid CT500BX10 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 191 202 202 202 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 307
Write 260
Mixed 244
SusWrite 196
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6.1
20% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 73%
Amd-raid Crucial_CT275MX3 275GB
255GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 207 218 218 213 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47% Average
Read 376
Write 390
Mixed 344
SusWrite 201
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 15.5
57% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 45.4
35% 46 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 44.8
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.3
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 42.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback