Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA560
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 08:54
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 215
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 645
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 148
Parallax 102
88% 119 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 84.7
Splatting 76.8
77% 96.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,997
Write 1,765
Mixed 1,428
385% 1,730 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 63
205% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 906
DQ Write 660
DQ Mixed 771
579% 779 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 297%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
213GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 109 113 117 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 129%
WD My Passport 260D 4TB
3TB free, PID 260d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 37 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 37.7
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 38
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.8% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 23
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0804
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback