Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z490 UD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 UD  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 10:27
Run Duration517 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 285
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,062
100% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,627
101% 1,627 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 416
Mixed 16.2
68% 311 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 28.2
40% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
WDC WD60EFAX-68JH4N0 6TB
14GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 75 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.3% Poor
Read 117
Write 125
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 75
22% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.9
44% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 0
2% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 73%
WDC WD60EFAX-68JH4N0 6TB
12GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 129 68 71 70 130 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.3% Very poor
Read 82.8
Write 54.5
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 89.9
16% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 0.7
8% 4.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 73%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 474 433 453 444 361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 464
Mixed 434
SusWrite 439
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 49.5
161% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 330
248% 333 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Synology HAT5300-8T 8TB
52GB free
Firmware: 1401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 122 118 122 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 134
Write 120
Mixed 89
SusWrite 120
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.4
6% 3.33 MB/s
DQ Read 1.8
DQ Write 8.8
DQ Mixed 0.7
2% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 25%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
19GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,113
Write 1,627
Mixed 1,178
294% 1,306 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 65.7
226% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 939
DQ Mixed 873
645% 839 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 299%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
19GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,276
Write 1,338
Mixed 1,549
380% 1,721 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 74.7
244% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 1,099
833% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$162
14GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 68 70 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 102%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB
14GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 93 94 96 93 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
65% Good
Read 129
Write 139
Mixed 111
SusWrite 94.5
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.9
459% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 65%
Great: 89%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB
14GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 98 97 90 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 110
Write 118
Mixed 77
SusWrite 93.5
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 89%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB
14GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 93 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 117
Write 126
Mixed 121
SusWrite 96
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
309% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 89%
Intenso External USB-3.0 5TB
33GB free
Firmware: 1203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 97 71 42 45 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 129
Write 97.4
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 56.2
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.8
274% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 68%
Intenso External USB-3.0 5TB
96GB free
Firmware: 1203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 75 103 103 110 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 72.1
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 86.9
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
226% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
14GB free
Firmware: D785
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 85 85 88 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 86.6
Write 118
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 84.4
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
229% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
14GB free
Firmware: D785
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 37 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 32.3
Write 37.5
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 40.2
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
240% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 90%
WD Elements 2TB
38GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 101
Write 99.7
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 51
101% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32%
Great: 44%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB
38GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 72 76 73 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 136
Write 140
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 74.1
122% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
58GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 38 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 41.4
Write 39.5
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 40.5
51% 38 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
164% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL32G32C16U4B.M16FB1 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 14.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 7% 76 9 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC219 PHL 242V8
History: Score 14: 1R 2G 3B | Score 13: 1R 2G 2B
Typical GA-Z490 UD Builds (Compare 2,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $749
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback