Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '17 at 16:57
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 105
48% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 324
31% 258 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 15.9
12% 14.7 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 16.9
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 54.9
Write 50.4
Mixed 48.5
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.13
4K Write 3.72
4K Mixed 0.51
256% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 36%
52netbar iShareDisk 240GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 52.8
Mixed 59.9
44% 58 MB/s
4K Read 2.57
4K Write 6.04
4K Mixed 0.99
329% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 33%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 7.63
11% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.72
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 1.13
94% 2.32 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback