Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z390 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive11.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 00:12
Run Duration814 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 656
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 9.4
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 8.7
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V820/128G 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0921A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 29 9 43 14 22 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.6% Very poor
Read 184
Write 145
Mixed 195
SusWrite 35.1
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.2
8% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 79%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
200GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 68 94 72 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.3% Average
Read 202
Write 205
Mixed 128
SusWrite 95
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 25
56% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 59.5
75% 133 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 111%
Toshiba MD06ACA800V 8TB
239GB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 59 52 62 53 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 118
Write 86.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 55.8
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 136%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
19GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 67
Write 138
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 68.5
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 109%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$52
39GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 62 60 56 53 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 76.1
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 60.2
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion 5TB
96GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 37 45 46 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 114
Write 67
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 43.4
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 5TB
96GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 14.9
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 17.2
12% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 67%
Mass Storage Device 2TB
646GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Read 11
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 3.5
9% 7.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/4G M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Pro4 Builds (Compare 5,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Pro4 - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback