Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 00:22
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 889
85% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 54.8
48% 66.3 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 48.6
45% 55.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD-240G 240GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1030A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 171 11 18 129 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 427
Write 356
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 78.7
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 6.47 MB/s
DQ Read 90.2
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 0.4
14% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 102%
SSD 240GB 240GB
73GB free
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 25 20 29 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 506
Write 404
Mixed 379
SusWrite 33.1
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 7.5
116% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 7.7
53% 118 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
767GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 167 165 158 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 150
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 166
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 GLOWAY SRE4U3200E16082C GLOWAY SRE4U3200E16082C Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 30.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 29.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $599
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback