Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200415
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '22 at 23:07
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	79%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 60.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 219 70% 129 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 842 75% 632 Pts	64-Core 861 53% 861 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 8756) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.8% Very good	Lighting 93.2 Reflection 91 Parallax 85.3 76% 89.8 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 80.8 Splatting 59.9 67% 84.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 834 641 644 639 629 631 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 2,070 Write 1,608 Mixed 1,487 SusWrite 669 326% 1,459 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 59.4 200% 70.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,133 DQ Write 795 DQ Mixed 904 691% 944 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 355%
Acasis 3598US 250GB 50GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 40 41 40 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.5% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 40.2 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 40.2 9% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 10.5 38% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 20.8 DQ Mixed 19 15% 21.3 MB/s

ACASIS 750GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 345GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 56 57 56 57 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 37.9 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 55.9 37% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 58%
Liteon UITRA1 1TB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 530GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 36 37 38 38 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 35.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 36 24% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 107%
hp v250w 32GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 18GB free, PID ae07 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	9.03% Terrible	Read 36.3 Write 1 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 10.9 14% 14 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.03% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 4x8GB 656 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 25.6 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 9.8 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,858x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,479x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,389x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	512x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	500x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	441x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	356x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	222x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	276x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $835

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16