Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 15:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 115
60% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 186
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2384) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 306.97
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 15% Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 293 307 347 318 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 251
Write 155
Mixed 206
SusWrite 302
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 38.9
121% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 54.6
47% 68.1 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 122%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
9GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 224
Write 184
Mixed 38
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 10.2
38% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 56%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
466GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 72 73 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 72.8
Write 40.9
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 71.3
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback