Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 11:13
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 266
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 705
74% 590 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 106
Parallax 8.5
5% 40.3 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 0.2
4% 6.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1792 1041 865 692 563 523 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,496
Write 1,949
Mixed 1357
SusWrite 913
322% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 68.2
226% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 1,022
783% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 234%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 24.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 28.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback