Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200416
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 10:15
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 253
92% 162 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 720
72% 587 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2009) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 93.2
Parallax 9.1
6% 36.5 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 12.2
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20902 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 65 45 57 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 1,155
Write 24.3
Mixed 74
SusWrite 62
69% 329 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 18.9
108% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 97.5
162% 339 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 26.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback