Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory44.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 13:20
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 260
78% 146 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 958
88% 739 Pts
64-Core 1824
113% 1824 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 309
Reflection 294
Parallax 329
252% 310 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 257
Splatting 192
210% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 210%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 488 460 394 325 272 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 491
Mixed 444
SusWrite 403
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 63.1
219% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 129%
Great: 131%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$300
209GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2357 2369 2369 2369 2359 2097 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
399% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 2,361
Mixed 1,525
SusWrite 2320
492% 2,190 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 90.9
318% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,427
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1,257
946% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 399%
Great: 425%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 257 258 259 258 259 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.3% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 484
Mixed 450
SusWrite 258
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 44.2
143% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 244
182% 241 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$229
682GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 196 196 196 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 376
Mixed 328
SusWrite 196
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51.3
175% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 244
182% 242 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 122%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 257 258 258 258 258 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.2% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 485
Mixed 448
SusWrite 258
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 44.2
143% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 245
182% 241 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$229
884GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 196 196 196 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 376
Mixed 324
SusWrite 196
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51.3
175% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 244
182% 242 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 122%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 41.9
Write 40.4
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 42
9% 40 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 1.3
23% 6.83 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 1.4
3% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 187 188 189 179 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 76.4
Write 134
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 181
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
215% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 37.1
Write 41
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 41.2
29% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
256% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 3x16GB
3 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 17.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 12.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback