Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 100% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '22 at 13:26
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 72.6 1-Core 140 2-Core 254 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 892 84% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,441 89% 1,441 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 403F) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)	113% Outstanding	Lighting 143 Reflection 143 Parallax 142 116% 142 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 142 Splatting 143 116% 142 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 657GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1653 1593 1588 1563 1618 1594 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 1,776 Write 1,790 Mixed 1,683 SusWrite 1,602 386% 1,713 MB/s	4K Read 60.6 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 51.8 181% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,137 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 268 291% 516 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 126GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 707 674 672 670 627 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 2,477 Write 1,193 Mixed 1,548 SusWrite 728 330% 1,487 MB/s	4K Read 65.9 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 46.3 183% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,209 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 238 283% 524 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 410%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 362GB free Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 395 394 388 390 385 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 408 Write 329 Mixed 244 SusWrite 393 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 19 74% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 95.5 DQ Mixed 163 120% 160 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 104%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 11GB free Firmware: MU02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 490 Write 349 Mixed 50 65% 296 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 17.3 72% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 82.1 DQ Mixed 159 115% 153 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 52GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 99 97 97 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 120 Write 117 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 96.9 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 68%
Seagate ST31000424CS 1TB 1,846 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 567GB free Firmware: CA13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 41 40 34 36 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 48 Write 38.5 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 37.2 30% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 62%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 3TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 115 109 113 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 102 Write 106 Mixed 76 SusWrite 114 73% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.1 265% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.2% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 27.2 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 27 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,646x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $198Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,412x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,236x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,469x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16