Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 06:54
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 64
1-Core 117
2-Core 240
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 703
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 1,194
74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 5.1
24% 13.6 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 4.7
18% 24.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 22%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
758GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1402 1545 1520 1593 1409 1714 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,102
Write 1,160
Mixed 1,325
SusWrite 1,531
290% 1,280 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 42.1
133% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 713
519% 681 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 209%
Great: 365%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 101 91 69 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 12.8
Write 30.5
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 90.2
39% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
189% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
63GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 97 150 145 150 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 132
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.3% Above average
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 23.4
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback