Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 66.4 2-Core 120 56% 90.1 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 285 33% 255 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 83F4) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Aspeed SSD 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0423B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 365 386 299 368 374 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 458 Write 370 Mixed 332 SusWrite 362 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 22.4 110% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 96.1 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 38.5 64% 120 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 80%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 1,415 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9.3 9.3 8.9 9.6 8.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5.37% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 1 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 9 9% 7.88 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.37% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 37,489 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.7% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.1 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358