Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 23:04
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 67.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 965
90% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 89.7
Parallax 83.6
74% 87.9 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 79.8
Splatting 72.4
70% 88.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 416 413 436 436 443 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 399
Mixed 316
SusWrite 423
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 38.2
139% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 185
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$178
979GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 435 427 441 449 448 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 441
Mixed 426
SusWrite 435
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 57.3
184% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 136%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
129GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 154
Write 152
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 117
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78%
Great: 108%
WD WD60EFZX-68B3FN0 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 192 192 192 195 193 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 120%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 251GB
206GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.8 6.5 6.9 7.1 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 8.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 7
12% 9.18 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.5
89% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $945
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback