Acidanthera iMac19,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcidanthera iMac19,1  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 01:25
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 149
2-Core 295
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,039
96% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,539
95% 1,539 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 104
56% 78.8 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 46.4
50% 63.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 985
Write 1,031
Mixed 930
220% 982 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 71.1
257% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 507
423% 593 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 253%
MM2000GEFRA 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: HPG8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 67.7
73% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 27.6
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,1 Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Acidanthera iMac19,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback