Today's hottest deals

Acidanthera iMac19,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcidanthera iMac19,1  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 17:46
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 956
87% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,537
95% 1,537 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Lighting 81.7
Reflection 88.8
Parallax 78.6
67% 83 fps
MRender 77.5
Gravity 77.1
Splatting 69.1
60% 74.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 248 251 249 251 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 470
Write 403
Mixed 258
SusWrite 250
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 38.1
138% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 271
207% 284 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 133%
Sandisk U100 32GB
27GB free
Firmware: 10.56.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 111 111 110 111 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 433
Write 108
Mixed 130
SusWrite 109
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 11.8
52% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 14.3
13% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
274GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 144 150 145 146 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 179
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 145
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,1 Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Acidanthera iMac19,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $592
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback