Today's hottest deals

Toxic GM7MPHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToxic GM7MPHP  (all builds)
MotherboardToxic GM7MPHP
Memory12.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200711
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 20:46
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 774
73% 607 Pts
64-Core 1143
71% 1143 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 108A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1368
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 133
Parallax 8.7
5% 49.2 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 13.8
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile)
Device(1D05 108A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.1% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 134
Parallax 126
97% 126 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 108
Splatting 106
104% 131 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 258 219 197 189 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 2,155
Write 206
Mixed 884
SusWrite 307
193% 888 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 69.1
222% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 916
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 737
557% 754 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 208%
Great: 208%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
1GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,193
Write 2,229
Mixed 1,256
421% 1,893 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 72.2
235% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 788
594% 802 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Jmicron Tech 250GB
18GB free
Firmware: 0209
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 588
Write 494
Mixed 560
122% 547 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 37.1
124% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 176
128% 164 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 82%
Lacie Mobile Drive 5TB
397GB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 49.9
Write 57.5
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 74.4
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 25.4
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 26
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GM7MPHP Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Toxic GM7MPHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback