Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80ST  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Toronto 5B1
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '22 at 10:35
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 85.2
44% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 136
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 8.4
4% 6.7 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 6
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 255 296 294 326 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67% Good
Read 345
Write 314
Mixed 295
SusWrite 286
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 25
95% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 145
110% 147 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 106%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
26GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 9.5 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 19.2
Mixed 20
SusWrite 9.3
23% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80ST Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback