Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 18:26
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 956
83% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,465
91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
Gigabyte(1458 4045) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 307
Parallax 331
249% 315 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 256
Splatting 193
210% 266 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2618
Write 2,450
Mixed 1,835
512% 2,301 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 77.7
281% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,217
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 1,058
791% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
198GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 451 447 446 437 290 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 421
Mixed 404
SusWrite 418
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 55.2
181% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
91GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 85.9
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
132GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 95 95 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 85.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 92.6
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
47GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 77.8
Write 44.3
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 51.3
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 58%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
159GB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 40 40 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 36.8
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 38.7
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4R.M16FE BL16G32C16U4R.M16FE BL16G32C16U4R.M16FE1 BL16G32C16U4R.M16FE1 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.1% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 30.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,753
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback