Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 09:46
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 858
76% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,422
88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (165 fps cap detected)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 165
Parallax 165
134% 165 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 165
Splatting 129
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disque virtuel Microsoft 1TB
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 276 274 206 331 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 93%
Asmt 2135 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 475 470 455 458 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 452
Mixed 416
SusWrite 464
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 42.3
138% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 275
202% 267 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
NE-1TB 1TB
1GB free
Firmware: T0417A3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,416
Write 1,408
Mixed 980
282% 1,268 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 25.4
181% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 504
460% 700 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 270%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 35.4
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback