Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory34.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime64.7 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 76.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 254
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 656
72% 569 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 24.7
20% 23.1 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 22.4
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
886GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 374 367 381 389 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 386
Mixed 388
SusWrite 377
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 42.4
148% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 172
138% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 352 332 324 356 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 433
Write 229
Mixed 223
SusWrite 330
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 33.6
108% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 204
140% 175 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
16GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 192 185 198 204 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 295
Write 222
Mixed 310
SusWrite 195
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 20.5
60% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 174
128% 167 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 14TB
7GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 30 32 33 31 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 6
Write 5.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 32.2
8% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 130%
WD Elements 2TB
450GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 34.5
Write 32.9
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 36.6
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 25F3 256GB
7GB free, PID 25f3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 40.9
Write 39.2
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 39.8
54% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 10.2
902% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 13.7
1,236% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 260%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 166 171 171 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 150
Mixed 104
SusWrite 168
192% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.3
248% 3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 100%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
288GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 107 112 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 113
Mixed 102
SusWrite 112
150% 109 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.6
223% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 185 185 184 185 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 168
Write 185
Mixed 131
SusWrite 184
229% 167 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.8
221% 3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3000C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 15.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback