Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 18:03
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 329
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 32
Parallax 38.2
24% 33.4 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 39
Splatting 32
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 218 57 6.3 41 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 254
Write 232
Mixed 234
SusWrite 121
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 22.3
90% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 34.4
68% 135 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
147GB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 23 22 23 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 26.8
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 23.2
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 64%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 23
Write 2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.3
8% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback