MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 04:42
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 941
89% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,392
86% 1,392 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 108
Parallax 98.3
83% 103 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 97.7
80% 97 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DM63FM2-V2113H 512GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 162 162 164 154 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.2% Excellent
Read 366
Write 282
Mixed 256
SusWrite 185
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 38.5
150% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 198
178% 268 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 85%
DM63FM2-V2113H 512GB
347GB free
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 171 228 289 173 305 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.5% Average
Read 264
Write 102
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 252
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 13.9
62% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 24.5
DQ Mixed 23
18% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 85%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
189GB free
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 176 167 158 173 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 286
Write 252
Mixed 264
SusWrite 163
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 40.8
140% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 186
147% 201 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 89%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
287GB free
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 462 463 464 463 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 458
Mixed 392
SusWrite 463
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 48.1
168% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 266
214% 300 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 115%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 33.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 33.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 5,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback