Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 23:23
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 709
67% 555 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
8.57% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 14.4
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 9.2
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
692GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2030 2075 2036 2047 2057 2050 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,166
Write 2,044
Mixed 1,408
SusWrite 2,049
431% 1,917 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58.6
198% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 719
524% 689 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 303%
Great: 477%
WDC WD40 03FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 195 197 196 194 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 190
Write 196
Mixed 129
SusWrite 198
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.6
14% 5.27 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 6.3
DQ Mixed 4
3% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 28%
WDC WD40 EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 224 223 224 220 222 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
Read 381
Write 277
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 223
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 1
47% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4BU008G-H3600U0H 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback