Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory15.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 22:27
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 76.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 257
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 799
76% 631 Pts
64-Core 1,292
80% 1,292 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 119
Parallax 118
97% 119 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 183
Splatting 119
140% 179 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 109%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,762
Write 1,801
Mixed 1,591
384% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 55.3
197% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,091
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 920
696% 941 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$130
168GB free
Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,931
Write 3,492
Mixed 2897
696% 3,107 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 74.6
259% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,302
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 1,092
832% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 228% Great: 595%
Amd-raid SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: 9000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 359 288 201 120 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 389
Write 317
Mixed 326
SusWrite 239
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 15.2
55% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 87.8
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 88.8
75% 107 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 86%
Amd-raid SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
53GB free
Firmware: 9000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 362 283 267 311 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 356
Write 347
Mixed 334
SusWrite 309
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 15
57% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 76.9
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 86.7
76% 110 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 86%
Amd-raid Array 3 959GB
318GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 745 255 156 155 154 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 505
Write 722
Mixed 211
SusWrite 270
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 11.3
51% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 126
96% 130 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 117%
Amd-raid CT2000BX50 2TB
603GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 49 27 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 271
Write 268
Mixed 252
SusWrite 68.6
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 13.9
57% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 56.6
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 32.8
45% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 33.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 27.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,077
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback