Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory66 GB free of 80 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 04:40
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 85.8
1-Core 172
2-Core 338
106% 199 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1,233
114% 949 Pts
64-Core 2252
139% 2252 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 122
Parallax 142
119% 136 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 140
Splatting 114
116% 146 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,625
Write 2,012
Mixed 1,695
399% 1,777 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 84
279% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 322
446% 829 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
332GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 456 457 458 457 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 452
Mixed 457
SusWrite 457
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 53.4
174% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 456 457 458 457 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 450
Mixed 423
SusWrite 456
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 51.5
168% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 211 212 212 212 221 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
Toshiba HDWR11A 10TB
8TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 232 238 235 237 241 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 234
Write 209
Mixed 59
SusWrite 236
134% 185 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 F4-3200C16-32GTZN BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 F4-3200C16-32GTZN 79GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767, 8192, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 36.6
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 113%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback