Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 02:15
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 143
2-Core 258
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 900
86% 710 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 243
Reflection 258
Parallax 521
198% 341 fps
MRender 387
Gravity 211
Splatting 332
254% 310 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 194%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$61
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 388
Write 346
Mixed 147
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 9.7
53% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 36.2
47% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 133 135 133 140 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 94.2
Write 139
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 132
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
270% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 24
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback