Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '23 at 16:01
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 288
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,090
98% 828 Pts
64-Core 2107
130% 2107 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Sapphire(1DA2 E421) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 63
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 91.9
51% 73.2 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 39.8
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$114
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1892 1019 987 1012 1015 1001 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1103
Write 1,032
Mixed 1,347
SusWrite 1,154
262% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 66.4
215% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 870
640% 844 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 219%
Great: 306%
G-tech ArmorATD 2TB
28GB free
Firmware: 2007
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 121
Mixed 75.1
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
229% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 106 105 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 170
Write 153
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 105
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 78 79 79 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44% Average
Read 73.8
Write 85.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 79.3
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44%
Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
576GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 113 110 113 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 136
Write 146
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 111
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 84%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB
11TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 230 225 226 232 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 236
Write 233
Mixed 124
SusWrite 228
150% 205 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1
398% 4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
83GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 24 24 14 9.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 102
Write 34.4
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 18.8
38% 39 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.4
104% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 37%
WD Game Drive 4TB
1TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 79 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 73.1
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 78.7
94% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 40.5
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 40.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 113%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $803
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback