Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive5.79% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory39 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '23 at 22:28
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700-$323
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 211
2-Core 425
126% 242 Pts
4-Core 848
8-Core 1,662
148% 1,255 Pts
64-Core 3,095
192% 3,095 Pts
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 67.5
58% 70.5 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 62.9
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 39 11 7 28 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.79% Terrible
Read 38
Write 42.8
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 23.6
6% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 5.7
7% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 102%
WDC WD20EZAZ-22L9GB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 170 171 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 181
Write 164
Mixed 97
SusWrite 170
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.9
59% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 40%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
54GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 91.2
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 89.8
67% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
85GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 163 159 165 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 164
Mixed 101
SusWrite 162
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 36
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 32.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $797
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback