Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 341%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 380%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics322% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive503% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 23:25
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 175
2-Core 346
109% 204 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,329
120% 1,011 Pts
64-Core 2,275
141% 2,275 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Asus(1043 889B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
322% Outstanding
Lighting 480
Reflection 573
Parallax 731
391% 594 fps
MRender 527
Gravity 560
Splatting 267
351% 451 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 322%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
698GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2584 3288 3207 3919 3786 1329 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
503% Outstanding
Read 3,688
Write 4,027
Mixed 2,473
SusWrite 3,019
743% 3,302 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 85.3
319% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,777
DQ Write 1,549
DQ Mixed 1,667
1,248% 1,664 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 503%
Great: 622%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$63
954GB free
Firmware: 32A0T54A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 1441 1440 1446 1443 1444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 2,143
Write 1,429
Mixed 1,151
SusWrite 1,387
341% 1,528 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 92.4
299% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,279
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 495
528% 886 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 312%
Great: 372%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 177 179 180 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 156
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 178
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 61.5
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 46.6
148% 51.8 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 43.6
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $786
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback