Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 13:42
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 804
77% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,214
75% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 113
Parallax 142
105% 128 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 978 805 780 450 612 616 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,216
Write 1,602
Mixed 1,199
SusWrite 707
318% 1,431 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 77.2
200% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,216
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 511
547% 913 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 246%
Great: 372%
Sandisk S3 4T00 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 363 375 371 367 388 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 433
Write 397
Mixed 304
SusWrite 359
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 28.3
68% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 198
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 115%
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$740
207GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 208 218 264 92 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 3.2
Write 176
Mixed 9
SusWrite 209
23% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 21
78% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 155
128% 185 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
580GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 143 145 141 141 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 135
Write 127
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 141
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$182
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 150 151 154 152 154 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 203 208 209 204 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 139
Write 171
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 202
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.8FE TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 BL8G32C16U4B.8FE TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
3733, 3733, 3733, 3733 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 42.5
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 35.9
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 5R 10G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 38% 53 539 443 100 24.5" 1920 1080 BNQ7F51 ZOWIE XL LCD
History: Score 37: 0P 4R 3G 8B | Score 60: 0P 5R 10G 5B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $313

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback