Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 14 '24 at 02:14
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 764
81% 646 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 3663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 180
Parallax 169
4% 118 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 140
Splatting 120
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TSA 256GB 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ61C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 222 29 48 55 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 60
Write 252
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 112
30% 129 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 24.3
101% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 79.3
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 37.4
66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 97%
Fanxiang S880E 1TB
649GB free
Firmware: H240314a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1965 1926 1791 1404 117 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 1,972
Write 2,073
Mixed 1,626
SusWrite 1,219
387% 1,722 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 68.4
223% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,644
DQ Write 1,073
DQ Mixed 1,282
977% 1,333 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 283%
Great: 506%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$32
24GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 83 85 89 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 71.3
Write 84.4
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 87
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 87 87 91 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 131
Write 122
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 87.4
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 75%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
817GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 78 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 65.1
Write 69.2
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 77.7
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
39GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 67 86 89 89 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 79.9
Write 83.3
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 82.8
50% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 28.9
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 30.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 7 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $782
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback