Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	16.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '19 at 17:31
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 82.6 1-Core 146 2-Core 273 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 846 81% 670 Pts	64-Core 1,170 72% 1,170 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 515 498 460 439 428 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,524 Write 618 Mixed 686 SusWrite 486 183% 829 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 50.2 173% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 43.1 DQ Write 660 DQ Mixed 58 132% 254 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 353%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 34GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 365 359 362 236 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Read 451 Write 367 Mixed 284 SusWrite 299 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 37.1 139% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 315 237% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 104%
Scst_fio vg0i3 239GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 29GB free Firmware: 221 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 59 59 60 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 80.7 Write 84.2 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 58.6 17% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 10.1 33% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 68.5 DQ Mixed 10.5 19% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 23%
Scst_fio vg0i0 599GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 168GB free Firmware: 221 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 32 34 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 82.5 Write 69.5 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 33.2 15% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 9.9 33% 9.9 MB/s	DQ Read 34.1 DQ Write 72 DQ Mixed 25.8 27% 44 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 24%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4GB free Firmware: U21010RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 343 Write 207 Mixed 282 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 22 118% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 77.3 102% 178 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 157GB free Firmware: MN6OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 102 103 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 82.7 Write 80.7 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 101 58% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 150GB free Firmware: CC35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 58 56 58 58 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 87 Write 75 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 47.6 50% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 68%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 86GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 115 92 130 97 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 114 Write 86 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 113 69% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.2% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 22.2 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 21.7 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	562x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	152x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	126x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16