Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 16:06
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 85%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 697
69% 563 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 59.9
58% 66.6 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 610 290 297 301 296 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,379
Write 1,461
Mixed 1,233
SusWrite 349
300% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 66
218% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 645
466% 608 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 211%
Great: 280%
Adata SU 650 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: R052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 380 395 411 410 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 474
Write 419
Mixed 383
SusWrite 399
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 26.6
116% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 41
76% 146 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 87%
Great: 90%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
104GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 119 111 131 126 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 407
Write 126
Mixed 198
SusWrite 121
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 34.2
130% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 158
121% 164 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 82%
Ts128gmt S800 128GB
63GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 124 155 125 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 345
Write 155
Mixed 200
SusWrite 140
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 24.5
82% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 110
87% 122 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
234GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 136
Write 127
Mixed 118
SusWrite 102
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
472GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 115
Write 107
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 105
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
245GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 74 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 46.2
Write 28.7
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 74.5
37% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 60%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
533GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 139 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 94
Write 75.5
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 139
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 2.8
467% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 112%
ASMT 2105 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 174 164 174 174 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 115
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 170
154% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 24
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 24.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback