Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 04:30
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 135
2-Core 223
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 796
78% 639 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 54.5
Reflection 9.19
Parallax 50.9
44% 38.2 fps
MRender 77.6
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 71.1
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 444 464 426 479 468 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,211
Write 1,384
Mixed 1163
SusWrite 512
292% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 73
214% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1,127
DQ Mixed 1,192
900% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 242%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
21GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 454
Mixed 347
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 48.9
160% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 242
196% 280 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 116 86 123 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 94
Write 134
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 108
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 99 103 93 109 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 118
Write 50.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 104
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 16GB
11GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.4 6.7 6.1 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 8
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 6.1
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.1
95% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $298

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $911
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback