Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '20 at 21:11
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 78.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 247 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 947 86% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,337 83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Lighting 63 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 87.1 51% 73.1 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 60.8 Splatting 55.2 49% 61 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 248 230 224 227 222 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 439 Mixed 444 SusWrite 244 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 48.7 159% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 202 152% 205 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 128%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$112 26,139 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8GB free Firmware: Q0922FS Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 481 Write 401 Mixed 381 94% 421 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 38 126% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 72.7 DQ Write 83.4 DQ Mixed 0.7 22% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Seagate ST3000NM0033-9ZM178 3TB 1,501 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: EN07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 170 168 168 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 166 Mixed 87.7 SusWrite 170 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 102%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 176GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 37.3 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 20.7 38% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 43%
Seagate Backup 500GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 181GB free, PID 2400 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 22 22 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 38.2 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 21.6 40% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	81.3% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 27 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 24.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,037

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16