Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	14.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '21 at 12:53
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 436 59% 440 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34% Below average	Lighting 39.5 Reflection 37.6 Parallax 51.1 32% 42.7 fps	MRender 53.9 Gravity 48.4 Splatting 38.7 38% 47 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,392 Write 2179 Mixed 1,334 437% 1,968 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 76.9 255% 87.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,013 DQ Write 1,048 DQ Mixed 1,143 828% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Asm1153u ASM1153USB3.0TOS 250GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 229GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 92 200 203 162 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 28.8 Write 15 Mixed 33 SusWrite 153 13% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 12.7 46% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 81.9 DQ Write 41.9 DQ Mixed 42.9 37% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 56%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 217GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 482 480 400 364 363 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 475 Mixed 432 SusWrite 428 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 55.2 182% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 355 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D26BFT4K.C8FD 2x8GB 2,224 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 25.6 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 25.6 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	684x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	581x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	484x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	586x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	385x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	316x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	247x

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $809

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16