Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z370-A (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180702
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '23 at 12:43
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 7 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.5% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 187 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 502 49% 403 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T10 18 User benchmarks, average bench 103% Nvidia(10DE 1370) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2727 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 134 Parallax 178 122% 154 fps	MRender 160 Gravity 151 Splatting 129 118% 147 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 117%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 129 133 129 135 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 303 Write 187 Mixed 225 SusWrite 130 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 8.9 31% 9.17 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 74.1 DQ Mixed 105 77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 31TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 130 128 133 131 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 321 Write 178 Mixed 236 SusWrite 129 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 7.9 28% 8.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 61GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 123 125 127 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 291 Write 185 Mixed 235 SusWrite 124 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 7.6 25% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x12GB 4,175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 29.5 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 24.7 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	5,987x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	2,124x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	935x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,113x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1,071x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	742x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	539x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	492x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	407x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	847x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	315x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	306x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $907

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16