Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 22:53
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 754
71% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 94.1
57% 77.6 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 53
52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1599 1403 1426 1426 1391 1388 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,624
Write 2,351
Mixed 1,830
SusWrite 1,439
462% 2,061 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 87.4
285% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 799
599% 802 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 317%
Great: 392%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
220GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1024 1036 828 795 794 798 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,513
Write 1,239
Mixed 1,246
SusWrite 879
273% 1,219 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 87.6
283% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 889
671% 899 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 243%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
193GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2278 789 788 791 794 793 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,537
Write 2,501
Mixed 1,875
SusWrite 1,039
445% 1,988 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 89.8
303% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 887
669% 898 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 299%
Great: 340%
Amd-raid SanDisk S3 1TB
409GB free
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 413 415 411 411 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 336
Write 391
Mixed 229
SusWrite 412
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 22
80% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94.6
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 122
118% 180 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 75%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
233GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 219 225 237 237 231 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
63% Good
Read 364
Write 254
Mixed 161
SusWrite 232
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 14.9
89% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 23.9
64% 134 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63%
Great: 74%
Amd-raid Array 1 511GB
476GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 171 171 171 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 619
Write 115
Mixed 257
SusWrite 170
215% 290 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 4.2
1,193% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 228%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 33.4
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 28.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 1R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 10% 84 331 267 60 0" 1920 1080 AUS24A1 VG245
History: Score 11: 0R 2G 5B | Score 20: 1R 4G 3B
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback